Superform UP
Thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, Superper's roadmap delivery remains a key focus, currently holding a solid C+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C+56.62 / 100
Sector Rank #101 · Global Rank #204
Overall Rating
C+ · 56.62 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
46.86
Team Governance
66.97
Market Ecosystem
72.13
Security & Compliance
55.47
Overall Score
56.62
Superform has an overall rating C+f C (total score 55.01), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main points of deduction were roadmap delivery (37.5 points) — mainly influenced by development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Superform has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance, with current weaknesses focused on roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade delivery data.Weight 30%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Technical Implementation
63/100Consensus Mechanism?As a DeFi protocol, it relies on the consensus mechanism of mature underlying public chains.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The main network startup time for the project is relatively short, and operational experience is insufficient.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information about the quality of recent upgrades.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As a DeFi protocol, client diversity mainly depends on the underlying chain.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Tokenomics
48.58/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism, but its exact strength needs to be continuously monitored.Weight 30%69 / 100 · 68.6 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a large number of token unlocks and releases, resulting in significant inflationary pressure in the short term.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market circulation is relatively high.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, and long-term inflation is manageable.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
66.97/100Core Development Team?Core team members have good backgrounds but are relatively small in scale.Weight 30%64 / 100 · 64.3 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There are governance mechanisms, but the specific degree of decentralization and activity need to be observed.Weight 25%71 / 100 · 71 / 100
Financial Transparency?Secured multiple rounds of financing, with high transparency in funding sources.Weight 25%71 / 100 · 71 / 100
Concentration of key people?Despite the existence of single-address control, project teams may reduce risks through other mechanisms.Weight 20%61 / 100 · 60.9 / 100
Market Ecosystem
66.5/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s, offering strong cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Developer community?Developer activity is relatively low, and community engagement needs improvement.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Security & Compliance
42/100Historical Major Failure?There are currently no major security incident records, and no safety red line has been triggered.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is uncertainty regarding regulatory attitudes toward DeFi protocols worldwide.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on DeFi protocols remains unclear, raising potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
C+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| SuperformC+ · 56.62 |  xDollar StablecoinC+ · 59.88 |  PixelsC+ · 59.72 |  HashflowC+ · 59.65 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 56.62 | 59.88 | 59.72 | 59.65 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 56.61 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | 60.25 | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 46.86 | 64.15 | 35 | 35 |
| Team Governance | 66.97 | 58.84 | 87.43 | 73.37 |
| Market Ecosystem | 72.13 | 62.2 | 76.12 | 90.7 |
| Security & Compliance | 55.47 | 56.92 | 61.87 | 56.17 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.