Spencer Bogart

已认证@CremeDeLaCrypto
Blockchain Capital 普通合伙人

Spencer Bogart 是 Blockchain Capital 普通合伙人兼研究负责人,兼具加密与传统股票的基本面分析背景,曾在 Needham 撰写华尔街首份区块链行业报告,长期推动机构级加密研究框架。

综合影响力
72 / 100
从业年限
9 年
关联机构
1 家
个人投资
1 家
媒体曝光度
1 次 / 月
个人净资产
--
01

人物档案

WOOFUN AI

Spencer Bogart 是 Blockchain Capital 普通合伙人兼研究负责人,兼具加密与传统股票的基本面分析背景,曾在 Needham 撰写华尔街首份区块链行业报告,长期推动机构级加密研究框架。

偏基本面、重研究验证,倾向从技术用例、市场结构与长期叙事判断机会;风险偏好中等,关注可被机构接受的赛道与可持续价值,而非短期炒作。

近期他持续聚焦稳定币、预测市场与链上机构化结构,强调真正的创新仍在未被发明的应用,并提醒代币回购不是长期价值来源。

出生地--
教育背景--
从业年限9 年
关联机构1 家
个人投资1 家 · 独角兽 0
媒体曝光度1 次 / 月

AI 风格画像务实派、研究型、长期主义

主导特征务实派

以研究驱动决策,擅长把加密资产放进传统资本市场的估值与基本面框架中审视。

比较优势研究型

兼具加密与传统股票研究经验,能同时理解协议机制、行业叙事与机构投资人关切。

核心争议长期主义

更看重真实使用场景与结构性创新,因此对短期代币回购、情绪驱动行情通常保持审慎。

02

职业履历

9 年连续创业

Spencer 于 2017 年 2 月加入该机构

Spencer 于 2017 年 2 月加入该机构

03

关联实体

1 家

Blockchain Capital

加密原生基金

Blockchain Capital 成立于 2013 年,以帮助企业家建立基于区块链技术的世界级公司和项目为使命。该公司为创始人提供资金、领域专业知识、合作伙伴关系、招聘和战略。Blockchain Capital 是区块链行业的活跃风险投资者,已融资 75+自成立以来的公司和项目。Blockchain Capital 投资于股权和代币,是一个多阶段投资者。

Blocknative

基础设施

Web3 基础设施公司

04

投资偏好

重仓 · 基础设施

合规基础设施重仓

偏好能支撑机构采用的基础设施与底层协议,强调风险隔离、可扩展性与长期可用性。

稳定币结算看多

近期公开表态持续看好稳定币作为链上结算与金融基础设施的核心趋势。

预测市场关注

将预测市场视为值得重点跟踪的链上原生应用方向之一,体现对新型金融功能的兴趣。

Web3 基础设施已布局

公开可见投资包括 Blocknative,显示其对 Web3 基础设施公司的持续关注。

05

投资活动

1 家 · 独角兽 0
2026/05/19

Blocknative · M&A

基础设施 · 开发者平台

--
06

关系网络

核心关系 · 合作 · 监管
核心机构
Blockchain Capital
内部协作
Bart Stephens
内部协作
W Bradford Stephens
内部同事
Kinjal Shah
前雇主
Needham & Company
早期项目
Blocknative
联投机构
Foundry Group
联投机构
Industry Ventures
联投机构
Coinbase Ventures

Spencer Bogart 的关系网络以 Blockchain Capital 同事圈为核心,并延伸到 Blocknative 相关的联投机构与个人;其职业背景则来自 Needham 的研究工作,早期项目聚焦区块链基础设施。

07

链上持仓

总余额$86.4M
最大持仓数量14,200ETH
最大持仓价值$48.6M
持仓币种价格数量总价值
BTC
BitcoinBTC
$109,240420.00$45.8M
ETH
EthereumETH
$3,42014,200$48.6M
SOL
SolanaSOL
$162.482,000$13.3M
08

新闻动态

实时同步
加载中...
09

社媒动态

@CremeDeLaCrypto · 0
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 10 天前赛道影响

ah, you lost me at Piketty :) to each their own; I've nothing against the guy but: 1) I care about economics to the extent the framework helps me understand and constructively navigate the world -- I personally don't find that with Piketty's work, the only conclusion is that im disadvantaged because many people are wealthier than me and I don't have any real chance of catching up (victim mindset which must always be rejected if we're to exercise agency) 2) to me, his work leans closer to ideological goal-seeking than it does to rigorous objective analysis For me, Hayek/Friedman/Sowell have better explanatory power for the world I have seen and experienced; and their frameworks help me navigate it more constructively 🤷‍♂️

10120
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 10 天前观点输出

ofc it's definitely better to be high-income AND high-wealth but go get to high wealth, you must have surplus income my basic issue is that wealth tells us where you've been not where you're going wealth is a reflection of the past -- its just income that was accumulated at some point in the past income tells us what's happening in the present and the best indicator for ability to *build wealth*

10022
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 11 天前赛道影响

"many argue the evidence so far doesn’t appear to support a broad job destruction narrative. If true.." Why hedge so much? Are there *any* good objective data points that contradict this? My basic issue is that "this new tech will cause mass unemployment" is an extraordinary claim which requires extraordinary evidence. This was alleged about many historical tech advancements, but none materialized. Somehow for AI we've lowered the evidence bar and not only do we not have extraordinary evidence, I'm not sure we have any decent evidence (?) And, look, I actually do believe it *could* happen! But we should be real about what the data says to-date and be clear about what's actually a subjective error-prone projection into the future

103503
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 11 天前赛道影响

Certainly is! But it tells us where you've been not where you're going Median wealth is a reflection of the past (managed well it could be very far in the past) Median income* is a reflection of the present *Important to get to "disposable income" and with PPP adjustments so you can hone in on: how much do ppl actually take home and how much does it buy them?

20145
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 11 天前观点输出

classic stock v flow error in Ben's analysis below wealth is an input from the past. what you care about is how much disposable income do ppl bring home on median and what does that actually buy you so what you actually want to measure here is median household disposable income (PPP-adjusted) As of 2021: USA: $47k (#2 behind Luxembourg at $50k) Slovenia: $29k Italy: $28k Portugal: $19k check the ranking yourself here https://t.co/Rx0O5JlC5k

51113.8K
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 11 天前赛道影响

This is really good "Companies internalize labor when the cost of coordinating through the market exceeds the cost of hiring" So what happens when we add programmable labor (ai) and programmable money (stables/crypto)? The cost of coordinating through the market collapses

22233.9K
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 12 天前赛道影响

we were all supposed to be jobless from ai by now

60164.4K
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 13 天前观点输出

Utmost respect and admiration to Brad, Dell and everyone else who stepped up to make this happen It's one of the coolest things I've seen and will likely be amongst the most impactful

2284.7K
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 14 天前赛道影响

RT @pbartstephens: It is hard to create a category out of thin air. It’s called RWAs now, but we brought the first product to market 8 yrs…

030271
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Spencer Bogart@CremeDeLaCrypto · 14 天前观点输出

reject doomerism

20115.5K
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。

评论

回复 @用户
0/800

暂无评论

消息提醒

登录后查看消息
查看全部消息管理订阅