
Zilliqa ZIL
Zilliqa leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D rating.
Sector Rank #198 · Global Rank #1017
Overall Rating
D · 29.13 / 100Zilliqa has a comprehensive rating of D (total 28.44), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Zilliqa has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent upgrade delivery data is missing.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear information on pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?Historical deferral records are missing.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
55.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Adopts a mature hybrid PoW-PBFT consensus mechanism and sharding technology.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has operated stably for many years, standing the test of the market.Weight 15%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public data on the quality of recent upgrades.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of data on client diversity.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
26/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear data on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of clear inflation rate data, and the value capture mechanism is weak.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of clear data on staking rates or lock-up rates.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
80.7/100Core Development Team?The core team has excellent backgrounds and has received support from top VCs.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Safety scores and model evaluations show good governance intensity.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Financial Transparency?Proposal voting and fund usage are highly transparent.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?Core team members have strong backgrounds and sound governance mechanisms.Weight 20%76 / 100 · 76 / 100
Market Ecosystem
51.3/100Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with active on-chain activity.Weight 30%81 / 100 · 81 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As an L1 platform, it has token deployments on BSC.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
DeFi TVL?Although there are DeFi solutions, TVL data is missing or low.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Developer community?Lack of developer community activity data.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, with red line risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The lack of clear SEC stance poses red line risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency poses a red line risk.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV ZilliqaD · 29.13 | VOOID · 33.28 | IMOD · 33.25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 29.13 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 22.24 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 80.73 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 60.51 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |


Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.