Zama ZAMA
Thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, Zama remains a key focus on roadmap delivery, currently holding a solid C rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C48.96 / 100
Sector Rank #72 · Global Rank #260
Overall Rating
C · 48.96 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
47.5
Team Governance
85.71
Market Ecosystem
37.28
Security & Compliance
48.62
Overall Score
48.96
Zama has an overall rating Cf C (total 52.88), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main points of deduction were roadmap delivery (37.5 points) — mainly influenced by development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Zama has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
35/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery records.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, the mainnet and staking functions have been launched, and the public sale has been completed.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?There is little information about milestones to be disclosed for delivery.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
History Extension Record?There are currently no publicly available historical delays.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Technical Implementation
69.75/100Consensus Mechanism?Focused on fully homomorphic encryption technology, empowering privacy smart contracts.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet will go live between late 2025 and early 2026, with a short runtime.Weight 15%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Recent upgrades?Recently, the mainnet and staking functions have gone live, showing good progress.Weight 35%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Client Diversity?As a privacy layer protocol, client diversity does not apply directly.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
46/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism that helps capture value.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Inflation rate?There are token unlock plans, and short-term inflationary pressures are present.Weight 25%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The staking feature has just launched, but there is insufficient data on specific staking rates.Weight 25%25 / 100 · 25 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?The total supply is 11 billion, with a clear cap.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Team Governance
83.25/100Core Development Team?The team members have strong backgrounds, including several renowned cryptography experts.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of public, detailed information on governance mechanisms.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Financial Transparency?Secured multiple rounds of funding from well-known institutions, with transparent financial backgrounds.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Concentration of key people?The project has a high concentration of ownership addresses.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Market Ecosystem
52/100Active Address?Active address data performed well.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on four chains: Ethereum, BSC, Solana, and others.Weight 25%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
DeFi TVL?As a privacy protocol, DeFi TVL data does not apply directly.Weight 25%25 / 100 · 25 / 100
Developer community?GitHub activity data is missing, and the scale of the community remains to be seen.Weight 20%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Security & Compliance
46/100Historical Major Failure?Currently, there are no publicly reported major security incidents.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Privacy protocols may face stricter regulatory scrutiny.Weight 30%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's overall stance toward crypto assets is rather cautious, with uncertainty.Weight 30%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%25 / 100 · 25 / 100
C Peer Comparison
Export CSV| ZamaC · 48.96 |  Layer3C · 53.24 |  Baby Shark UniverseC · 53.03 |  DevvEC · 52.85 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 48.96 | 53.24 | 53.03 | 52.85 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 | 22.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 47.5 | 20.72 | 37.2 | 58.04 |
| Team Governance | 85.71 | 50.8 | 59.68 | 53.2 |
| Market Ecosystem | 37.28 | 96 | 62.92 | 66.86 |
| Security & Compliance | 48.62 | 62.36 | 60.42 | 52.51 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.