World Liberty Financial WLFI
World Liberty Financial leads in team governance and roadmap delivery, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding an E+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
E+19.8 / 100
Sector Rank #915 · Global Rank #1699
Overall Rating
E+ · 19.8 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
9.66
Team Governance
53.6
Market Ecosystem
23.97
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
19.8
World Liberty Financial overall rating E+ (total 19.8), ranking high in team governance, roadmap delivery, and market ecosystem across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "World Liberty Financial has relative advantages in team governance, roadmap delivery, and market ecosystem, but its current weaknesses are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
38.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and actual delivery data leads to low development continuity.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, there have been numerous product announcements, collaborations, and exchange listings.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Technical Implementation
46/100Consensus Mechanism?The project is deployed on a mature PoS chain, inheriting its consensus mechanism.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of core codebase and upgrade quality data.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of data on client diversity.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
9.66/100Deflationary Mechanism?There have been records of destruction, but the impact on overall inflation has been limited.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, creating significant inflationary pressure.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear data on staking or locking, with large players holding concentrated positions.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap, but the total is huge and value capture is weak.Weight 20%33 / 100 · 33.3 / 100
Team Governance
53.25/100Core Development Team?Team members come from diverse backgrounds, but their core development experience data is insufficient.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There is an active community voting and proposal mechanism.Weight 25%87 / 100 · 86.5 / 100
Financial Transparency?Fund information is disclosed, and treasury transparency is relatively high.Weight 25%87 / 100 · 86.5 / 100
Concentration of key people?Agency contracts exist, which may lead to centralized access to key individuals.Weight 20%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Market Ecosystem
23.5/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is low, indicating insufficient market activity.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and has cross-chain potential.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves, resulting in low third-party integration.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Developer community?Lack of a public codebase, and zero developer activity trends.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?Historical records show stablecoin depegging and token freeze events.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Political ties may lead to strict scrutiny from regulators.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The political background and U.S. ties may trigger SEC securities identification disputes.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public codebase and client-side bug frequency data.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
E+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| World Liberty FinancialE+ · 19.8 |  Main Street USDE+ · 19.99 |  SubQuery NetworkE+ · 19.98 |  GoGoPoolE+ · 19.98 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 19.8 | 19.99 | 19.98 | 19.98 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 9.66 | 0 | 1.56 | 28 |
| Team Governance | 53.6 | 30 | 52.8 | 68.32 |
| Market Ecosystem | 23.97 | 45.95 | 36.53 | 1.02 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.