Wing Finance WING
Wing Finance currently holds a solid B rating, thanks to its security, compliance, and strong market ecosystem performance, with technical implementation still being a key focus.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
B72.18 / 100
Sector Rank #15 · Global Rank #95
Overall Rating
B · 72.18 / 100Roadmap Delivery
65.5
Technical Implementation
61.2
Tokenomics
74.9
Team Governance
73.55
Market Ecosystem
75.59
Security & Compliance
76.8
Overall Score
72.18
Wing Finance has an overall rating Bf B (total score 72.18), ranking high in six dimensions for security compliance, market ecosystem, and economic model. The main deductible point is technical implementation (61.2 points)—a dimension lower than other dimensions in the six-dimensional score.
The rating team concluded: "Wing Finance has relative advantages in security and compliance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in technical implementation." " It is recommended to allocate moderate positions and continuously track subsequent improvements in weak area dimensions.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
66.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The lack of a public, detailed roadmap makes it difficult to assess delivery rates.Weight 35%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade information makes it impossible to assess achievement.Weight 30%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Detailed pending delivery milestones have not been disclosed, resulting in low transparency.Weight 20%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
History Extension Record?No major public delays were found, and the project remained active.Weight 15%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Technical Implementation
63/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature VBFT consensus mechanism, it offers relatively high security.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has operated stably for nearly six years, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information about recent upgrades makes it difficult to assess quality.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data poses potential centralization risks.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Tokenomics
73.75/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear deflationary mechanisms, but platforms capture value.Weight 30%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Inflation rate?There is uncirculated supply, but there is a supply cap, and inflation is controllable.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?TVL data is high, but token staking rates cannot be directly deduced.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap that helps control long-term inflation.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
72/100Core Development Team?Core team members are publicly disclosed but lack development activity data.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Governance mechanisms?It adopts a decentralized governance model and has a strong security score.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Financial Transparency?Received investment from well-known institutions, but limited transparency information on fund usage.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Concentration of key people?Lack of data on key figures holding coins or decision-making authority.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Market Ecosystem
75/100Active Address?Lower market rankings, but high community trust in security ratings.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream public chains and has strong cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
DeFi TVL?With millions of dollars in total DeFi locked value, the ecosystem is of considerable scale.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Developer community?There is a lack of public data on developer community activity, but the project remains active.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Security & Compliance
77.25/100Historical Major Failure?Safety score: High safety rating, no major public safety incidents were found.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Regulation in the DeFi sector is generally cautious, but projects are operating well.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on DeFi projects is unclear, raising potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lacking data on client bug frequency, but with high security scores.Weight 15%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
B Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Wing FinanceB · 72.18 |  VictionB · 73.33 |  FlowB · 73.28 |  ARKB · 73.17 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 72.18 | 73.33 | 73.28 | 73.17 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 65.5 | 74.5 | 72.23 | 72.78 |
| Technical Implementation | 61.2 | 71.7 | 65.5 | 64.7 |
| Tokenomics | 74.9 | 81 | 76.3 | 76.3 |
| Team Governance | 73.55 | 72.62 | 72.14 | 72.8 |
| Market Ecosystem | 75.59 | 69.85 | 75.83 | 74 |
| Security & Compliance | 76.8 | 71.62 | 74.86 | 75.79 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.