Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL
Virtuals Protocol leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently firmly holding a D+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D+35.57 / 100
Sector Rank #276 · Global Rank #671
Overall Rating
D+ · 35.57 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
19.1
Team Governance
73.92
Market Ecosystem
71.77
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
35.57
Virtuals Protocol has an overall rating D+f D (total score 33.96), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Virtuals Protocol has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
50/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of detailed information on recent upgrade achievements.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
65/100Consensus Mechanism?Adopt a mature L2 solution, inheriting L1 security.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has been running stably.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about the quality of recent technological upgrades.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public information about client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
53.75/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a staking mechanism, but there is no clear token burn deflation.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a risk of additional issuance, but there is a clear supply cap.Weight 25%55 / 100 · 55 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?A staking feature has been launched, but specific staking rate data is missing.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?A clear supply cap helps stabilize long-term value.Weight 20%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Team Governance
72.5/100Core Development Team?Team members are public, but there is a lack of detailed development activity data.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Security Score: High governance strength score, with a decentralized governance framework.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, supported by well-known investment institutions.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contracts carry risks of hiding owners and changing balances.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
75.5/100Active Address?Daily active addresses perform well, indicating high user engagement.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multi-chain ecosystems, expanding potential users and application scenarios.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project benefits from Base's high TVL, but its DeFi attributes are not strong.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Developer community?High social media attention but lack data on core developer community activity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Security & Compliance
38.75/100Historical Major Failure?The contract carries risks of hidden owners and the possibility of token issuance.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory information regarding the project.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear SEC stance information regarding the project.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
D+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Virtuals ProtocolD+ · 35.57 |  wojakD+ · 39.93 |  Polyhedra NetworkD+ · 39.91 |  yesnoerrorD+ · 39.9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 35.57 | 39.93 | 39.91 | 39.9 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 19.1 | 23.58 | 41.25 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 73.92 | 30 | 75.16 | 34.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 71.77 | 70 | 70.72 | 71.33 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 50.54 | 0 | 58.05 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.