USDD USDD
USDD leads thanks to its team governance and roadmap delivery, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding an E rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
E12.65 / 100
Sector Rank #1233 · Global Rank #2141
Overall Rating
E · 12.65 / 100Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
66.45
Market Ecosystem
10.47
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
12.65
USDD has an overall rating Ef E (total 12.65), ranking high in team governance, roadmap delivery, and market ecosystem across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "USDD has relative advantages in team governance, roadmap delivery, and market ecosystem, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
44.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public on-time delivery data.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There will be multiple USDD 2.0-related events in 2025.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No clear future milestones were found in the public information.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
73.8/100Consensus Mechanism?TRON uses DPoS consensus, with a mature mechanism but a high degree of centralization.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating a certain level of stability.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Recent upgrades?Security Score: A high security rating indicates good code quality.Weight 35%88 / 100 · 88 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
17.25/100Deflationary Mechanism?As an algorithmic stablecoin, its deflationary mechanism relies on arbitrage, but its stability is challenged.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Inflation rate?Tokens can be issued additionally, posing potential inflation risks.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up rate is extremely low, and the chips are highly concentrated in a few addresses.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?As an algorithmic stablecoin, it has no upper supply limit and carries potential risks.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Team Governance
60.75/100Core Development Team?Founder Justin Sun has extensive industry experience, but VC endorsement is average.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?It adopts a DPoS mechanism, governed by super representatives voting, offering high transparency.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Financial Transparency?High financial transparency is conducive to community oversight.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?Tokens are highly concentrated in a few addresses, posing centralization risks.Weight 20%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Market Ecosystem
37.5/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is low, and user participation is insufficient.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains and offers good scalability.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?Some DeFi TVL on some chains is relatively high, but overall ecosystem data is insufficient.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Developer community?The GitHub repository is empty, and developer community activity is extremely low.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
26/100Historical Major Failure?The contract has additional issuance rights, and algorithmic stablecoins face depegging risks.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Algorithmic stablecoins face cautious stance from global regulators.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC takes a cautious stance on algorithmic stablecoins, posing potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?A high security rating indicates a low risk of code vulnerabilities.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
E Peer Comparison
Export CSV| USDDE · 12.65 |  FAYAE · 13.3 |  PolkaswapE · 13.3 |  GaleonE · 13.28 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 12.65 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.28 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 24.75 | 0.9 |
| Team Governance | 66.45 | 30 | 49.6 | 42.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 10.47 | 17.52 | 8.2 | 9.85 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.