UnifAI Network UAI
UnifAI Network stands out for its security, compliance, and market ecosystem performance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
C-42.7 / 100
Sector Rank #135 · Global Rank #396
Overall Rating
C- · 42.7 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
47.17
Market Ecosystem
55.22
Security & Compliance
62.25
Overall Score
42.7
UnifAI Network has an overall rating C-f C (total 42.7), ranking highly in six dimensions for security compliance, market ecosystem, and team governance. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "UnifAI Network has relative advantages in security compliance, market ecosystem, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
36.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public roadmap delivery data, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery records makes it impossible to assess.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Technical Implementation
44/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Smart Chain, it adopts a mature PoSA consensus mechanism.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has short runtime and limited historical data.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of public recent upgrade records and quality assessments.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?BNB Chain client diversity is relatively low.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
28/100Deflationary Mechanism?Without a clear deflationary mechanism, token supply may continue to grow.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, posing significant inflationary pressure.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking or lock-up data, or the proportion is extremely low.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap that helps with long-term value.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
29.5/100Core Development Team?The core development team is relatively small in size and has a relatively low background score.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project has low decentralization, and governance mechanisms may be controlled by a few entities.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Financial Transparency?No public financing rounds, but the fund transparency score is acceptable.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold extremely high coins, posing a risk of centralization.Weight 20%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Market Ecosystem
38.74/100Active Address?High scores for active addresses indicate good user engagement.Weight 30%81 / 100 · 80.8 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on BNB Chain, with limited cross-chain ecosystem.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for the project itself.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Developer community?GitHub repositories are inactive, and developer community participation is low.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
54/100Historical Major Failure?No public records of major security incidents, and safety ratings are good.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory attitudes in AI and DeFi are generally cautious.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC has disputed the security attributes of crypto assets.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| UnifAI NetworkC- · 42.7 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 42.7 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 47.17 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 55.22 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 62.25 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.