Ultima ULTIMA
Ultima leads with its market ecosystem and team governance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D-23.86 / 100
Sector Rank #561 · Global Rank #1422
Overall Rating
D- · 23.86 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
50
Market Ecosystem
51.39
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
23.86
Ultima has an overall rating D-f D (total 23.86), ranking highly in six dimensions for market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Ultima has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model. " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of publicly available roadmap milestone data, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery details makes it impossible to assess the progress of achievements.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestone information was found.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
56.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on the mature BNB Smart Chain, the consensus mechanism is stable.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has accumulated some operational experience.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade details and quality assessment data.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?As a BNB Smart Chain ecosystem project, client diversity depends on BSC.Weight 20%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Tokenomics
7.75/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear data on deflationary mechanisms, making it impossible to assess their effectiveness.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Contracts have minting rights, which may lead to potential inflation risks.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, lacking staking or lock-up mechanisms.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a nominal cap, contracts can be issued additionally, and the upper limit is not fixed.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Team Governance
49/100Core Development Team?The core development team has limited information disclosure and mainly relies on the founders.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is relatively transparent, but the project is still essentially centralized.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, but there is no public information on financing rounds.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
25/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is acceptable, and user engagement is moderate.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The ecosystem is mainly concentrated on BNB Smart Chain, with low third-party integration.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi-type and lacks relevant TVL data.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Developer community?No public developer communities or codebases have been found.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
15/100Historical Major Failure?The contract has minting rights and is marked as a safety red line event.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information and uncertainty.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC judgment on the nature of its securities.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of data on client bug frequency, but overall security audit scores are acceptable.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| UltimaD- · 23.86 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 23.86 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 50 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 51.39 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.