Storj STORJ
Thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, Storj remains a key focus on roadmap delivery, currently holding a solid C rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
C48.01 / 100
Sector Rank #75 · Global Rank #272
Overall Rating
C · 48.01 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
10.52
Team Governance
77.14
Market Ecosystem
72.67
Security & Compliance
64
Overall Score
48.01
Storj overall rating C (total 46.89), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Storj has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
20/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade delivery data.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Technical Implementation
68.75/100Consensus Mechanism?The token is based on Ethereum and benefits from its mature PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has been running for a long time, accumulating rich operational experience.Weight 15%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available information on the quality of recent upgrades, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?There is a lack of public client diversity data, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
34/100Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, posing potential inflationary pressures.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The project does not have traditional token staking or locking mechanisms.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, which helps stabilize its long-term value.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
78.75/100Core Development Team?Core team members are transparent and open, but lack active development data.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There are community forums for discussion, and the security score and governance intensity score are relatively high.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Financial Transparency?Project financing information is public, and capital transparency is good.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Concentration of key people?The team structure is reasonable, with no excessive concentration of key individuals.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Market Ecosystem
65/100Active Address?High daily active addresses score well, indicating good user activity.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed across multiple chains and possesses certain cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not a core DeFi protocol and lacks direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Security & Compliance
60/100Historical Major Failure?Safety score: High safety score, no publicly disclosed major safety fault records.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory characterization, and the global regulatory environment is complex.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on crypto assets remains unclear and uncertain.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of public data on the frequency of client bugs, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
C Peer Comparison
Export CSV| StorjC · 48.01 |  Layer3C · 53.24 |  Baby Shark UniverseC · 53.03 |  DevvEC · 52.85 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 48.01 | 53.24 | 53.03 | 52.85 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 11.25 | 37.5 | 22.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 10.52 | 20.72 | 37.2 | 58.04 |
| Team Governance | 77.14 | 50.8 | 59.68 | 53.2 |
| Market Ecosystem | 72.67 | 96 | 62.92 | 66.86 |
| Security & Compliance | 64 | 62.36 | 60.42 | 52.51 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.