Sophon SOPH
Sophon leads in market ecosystem and security compliance, with economic models remaining a key focus, currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C-41.64 / 100
Sector Rank #125 · Global Rank #437
Overall Rating
C- · 41.64 / 100Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
6.03
Team Governance
52
Market Ecosystem
65.59
Security & Compliance
56.71
Overall Score
41.64
Sophon has an overall rating C-f C (total 41.64), ranking high in six dimensions for market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance. The main deduction points are in the economic model (6.03 points)—mainly influenced by short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points) and value capture (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Sophon has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
10/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data leads to low development continuity scores.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery records.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Undisclosed clear milestones to be delivered.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Technical Implementation
62/100Consensus Mechanism?As a L2 inheriting the security of Base/Ethereum, the consensus mechanism is mature.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has already passed its initial phase.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information on the quality of recent upgrades.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
6/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear deflationary mechanisms and data on token burns.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Circulating supply is far below total supply, and future inflationary pressures are high.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, market liquidity is high, and there is a lack of holding incentives.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap, but the token's ability to capture value is weak.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Team Governance
55.5/100Core Development Team?Core team members have limited background information and low development activity.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The authenticity of governance mechanisms scores high, but the project remains centralized.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Concentration of key people?There is a single ownership address, zero multi-signature ratio, and high concentration.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
45.02/100Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%83 / 100 · 83.4 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream chains, with broad ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project itself is not DeFi and lacks direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Developer community?Developer communities are inactive, and GitHub is lacking activity.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
39/100Historical Major Failure?There are currently no major security incident records, and audit coverage is high.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, and projects are highly centralized.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Sec Attitude?As a centralized project, it faces potential regulatory risks from the SEC.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?High audit coverage but lack of direct bug data.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| SophonC- · 41.64 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 41.64 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 6.03 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 52 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 65.59 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 56.71 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.