Somnia SOMI

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The project is relatively new and has limited public roadmap information, but early milestones were basically completed on schedule.Weight 35%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent major events such as mainnet launches and exchange listings have all been completed.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is little information about milestones to be disclosed for delivery, which may indicate insufficient information disclosure.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?The project has a relatively short history and currently has no major public delay records.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a customized PoS mechanism designed to improve transaction processing speed and efficiency.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet will launch in September 2025, with a short runtime awaiting long-term validation.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

Recent upgrades?The mainnet launch is a major milestone, currently running smoothly but lacking a public, detailed upgrade report.Weight 35%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Client Diversity?The lack of public client diversity data may pose risks of centralization.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Public information does not explicitly mention a deflationary mechanism, which may be introduced in the future.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a token unlock plan, but specific inflation rates require continued attention.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lack of public data on staking or lock-up rates makes accurate assessment difficult.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, with relevant industry experience.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Early project governance may lean toward core teams, but future efforts should open up to the community.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100

Financial Transparency?Received investment from well-known institutions, with relatively transparent funding sources.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?Founder Paul Thomas has considerable influence and a certain concentration of key figures.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Active Address?There is a lack of publicly available active address data, but as an L1 project, it is expected to have a certain user base.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As a Layer 1 blockchain, its ecosystem is under construction and has great potential.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project mainly focuses on the metaverse; DeFi TVL is not a core metric, but there is still room for growth.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100

Developer community?GitHub data is missing, and developer community activity needs improvement and public disclosure.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The project has a relatively short history and currently has no publicly disclosed records of major safety incidents.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory statements, and the company is currently in a neutral observation phase.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Sec Attitude?As L1 infrastructure, it is presumed to be non-securities, but the SEC's stance remains uncertain.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of publicly available data on client bug frequency, but the security score is relatively high.Weight 15%75 / 100 · 75 / 100