
SkyAI SKYAI
SkyAI, with its market ecosystem and security compliance performance, remains a key focus on roadmap delivery, currently firmly holding a C- rating.
Sector Rank #91 · Global Rank #311
Overall Rating
C- · 45.66 / 100SkyAI has an overall rating C-f C (total 45.66), ranking high in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "SkyAI has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade delivery information and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear information on pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
43.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Smart Chain, it adopts the PoSA consensus mechanism and delivers excellent performance.Weight 30%PoSA (BNB Chain) · 70 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%About 0.7 years · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data makes it impossible to assess the degree of decentralization.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
40/100Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflation mechanism design was found.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?The current circulating supply is close to its maximum supply, and the inflation rate is extremely low.Weight 25%Extremely low (close to maximum supply) · 80 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of data on staking or lock-up rates makes it impossible to assess market liquidity.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%1 billion · 100 / 100
Team Governance
76/100Core Development Team?Lack of public information about the core development team, and average background assessment.Weight 30%Insufficient data / average team background · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is sound, and the safety score ratings show high governance intensity.Weight 25%Good (High Intensity of Treatment) · 98 / 100
Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, voting on proposals and disclosure of treasury information.Weight 25%High transparency · 98 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contract ownership has been relinquished, management address types are good, and concentration is low.Weight 20%Low concentration · 90 / 100
Market Ecosystem
57.7/100Active Address?A high number of daily active addresses indicates good user engagement.Weight 30%High activity · 89 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on two mainstream chains, expanding the ecosystem's reach.Weight 25%2 (BNB Chain, Solana) · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not the core of DeFi and lacks direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data / Non-DeFi projects · 30 / 100
Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
Security & Compliance
47.75/100Historical Major Failure?So far, no publicly available major security incident records have been found.Weight 25%&None · 95 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance data, internal assessments show low compliance.Weight 30%Insufficient data / biased caution · 30 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC lacks a clear stance, but overall compliance assessments are low.Weight 30%There is controversy / insufficient data · 30 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to assess stability.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 40 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV SkyAIC- · 45.66 | DODOC- · 46.61 | BasenjiC- · 46.54 | OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 45.66 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 26.32 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 57.2 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 64.58 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 60.5 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |



Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.