SkyAI SKYAI

BNB Chain EcosystemMCPinfrastructureAI

SkyAI, with its market ecosystem and security compliance performance, remains a key focus on roadmap delivery, currently firmly holding a C- rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-04
C-45.66 / 100

Sector Rank #91 · Global Rank #311

Roadmap Delivery0F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics26.32F
Team Governance57.2E+
Market Ecosystem64.58D
Security & Compliance60.5D-
01

Overall Rating

C- · 45.66 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
26.32
Team Governance
57.2
Market Ecosystem
64.58
Security & Compliance
60.5
Overall Score
45.66

SkyAI has an overall rating C-f C (total 45.66), ranking high in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "SkyAI has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

0/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade delivery information and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear information on pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Technical Implementation

43.5/100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Smart Chain, it adopts the PoSA consensus mechanism and delivers excellent performance.Weight 30%PoSA (BNB Chain) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%About 0.7 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data makes it impossible to assess the degree of decentralization.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Tokenomics

40/100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflation mechanism design was found.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The current circulating supply is close to its maximum supply, and the inflation rate is extremely low.Weight 25%Extremely low (close to maximum supply) · 80 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of data on staking or lock-up rates makes it impossible to assess market liquidity.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%1 billion · 100 / 100

Team Governance

76/100

Core Development Team?Lack of public information about the core development team, and average background assessment.Weight 30%Insufficient data / average team background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is sound, and the safety score ratings show high governance intensity.Weight 25%Good (High Intensity of Treatment) · 98 / 100

Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, voting on proposals and disclosure of treasury information.Weight 25%High transparency · 98 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract ownership has been relinquished, management address types are good, and concentration is low.Weight 20%Low concentration · 90 / 100

Market Ecosystem

57.7/100

Active Address?A high number of daily active addresses indicates good user engagement.Weight 30%High activity · 89 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on two mainstream chains, expanding the ecosystem's reach.Weight 25%2 (BNB Chain, Solana) · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not the core of DeFi and lacks direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data / Non-DeFi projects · 30 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Security & Compliance

47.75/100

Historical Major Failure?So far, no publicly available major security incident records have been found.Weight 25%&None · 95 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance data, internal assessments show low compliance.Weight 30%Insufficient data / biased caution · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC lacks a clear stance, but overall compliance assessments are low.Weight 30%There is controversy / insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to assess stability.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

04

C- Peer Comparison

Export CSV
SkyAIC- · 45.66DODOC- · 46.61BasenjiC- · 46.54OKZOOC- · 46.47
Overall Score45.6646.6146.5446.47
Roadmap Delivery003037.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics26.3266.7924.531.07
Team Governance57.290.3751.656.4
Market Ecosystem64.5891.655.0167.44
Security & Compliance60.5060.4560.5

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions