Quant QNT
Quant leads in team governance and roadmap delivery, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding a solid D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-21.24 / 100
Sector Rank #846 · Global Rank #1600
Overall Rating
D- · 21.24 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
27.3
Team Governance
54.8
Market Ecosystem
14.44
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
21.24
Quant overall rating D- (total 21.41), with team governance, roadmap delivery, and economic modeling ranking high across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Quant has relative advantages in team governance, roadmap delivery, and economic modeling, but its current weaknesses are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
38.25/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data makes it difficult to assess.Weight 35%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a recent lack of publicly available information on major upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of clear technical milestones pending delivery, only event announcements.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public historical delay records, making accurate assessment impossible.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
50/100Consensus Mechanism?As tokens on Ethereum, it inherits Ethereum's mature PoS consensus.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The project has been online since 2018, with the mainnet running for a long time.Weight 15%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of publicly available recent upgrade information and code activity data.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?There is a lack of information about the diversity of Quant's own clients.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Tokenomics
28.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?Tokens carry the risk of additional issuance and lack a clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Inflation rate?Tokens can be issued in additional quantities, posing potential inflation risks.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The staking or lock-up rate is extremely low, and the market liquidity is high.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Tokens have clear supply caps.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
54.75/100Core Development Team?The core development team is low in activity, and GitHub code contributions are insufficient.Weight 30%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are centralized, but the safety score evaluates strong internal controls.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Financial Transparency?Operating funds are highly transparent, but total financing information is lacking.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Concentration of key people?Token holding is highly concentrated, posing potential risks.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Market Ecosystem
15.5/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is low, and user participation is insufficient.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The number of ecosystems and third-party integrations is relatively low.Weight 25%15 / 100 · 15 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi TVL is relatively low, and cross-chain liquidity is limited.Weight 25%15 / 100 · 15 / 100
Developer community?Developer communities are low in activity and lack of code contributions.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?Tokens can be issued additionally, triggering a security red line, posing significant security risks.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory attitude information, making it impossible to assess.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear SEC stance information, making it impossible to assess.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of client-side bug frequency data makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| QuantD- · 21.24 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 21.24 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 54.8 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 14.44 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.