Pudgy Penguins PENGU
Pudgy Penguins leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently firmly holding a C+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
C+53.55 / 100
Sector Rank #56 · Global Rank #220
Overall Rating
C+ · 53.55 / 100Roadmap Delivery
22.5
Tokenomics
47.67
Team Governance
62.77
Market Ecosystem
71.65
Security & Compliance
53.92
Overall Score
53.55
Pudgy Penguins has an overall rating C+f C (total 54.74), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction was roadmap delivery (22.5 points) — mainly influenced by development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Pudgy Penguins has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and security compliance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
19/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data leads to low development activity.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a recent lack of clear record of upgrade deliveries and code activity.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of historical delivery records and low development activity.Weight 15%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Technical Implementation
52/100Consensus Mechanism?As a multi-chain token, its security depends on mature public chain consensus.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Main network years of operation?The token launched in December 2024 and has a relatively short runtime.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade information and code activity data at the token contract level.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?As a token, it does not involve client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
62/100Deflationary Mechanism?There have been significant records of token burns, indicating deflationary potential.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Inflation rate?There are plans for future token unlocks, bringing potential inflationary pressures.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?On-chain data shows that the proportion of staking or locked staking is extremely low.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
50/100Core Development Team?Core team members have clear backgrounds and VC support.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Low degree of project decentralization and insufficient transparency in governance mechanisms.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Financial Transparency?Transparency in fund usage and proposal voting needs improvement.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Concentration of key people?There is a high concentration of key individuals and holdings.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Market Ecosystem
62/100Active Address?The number of on-chain active addresses performed well.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and offers strong scalability.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
DeFi TVL?As an NFT token, direct DeFi TVL data is not applicable and lacks relevant metrics.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and code contributions.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Security & Compliance
67.25/100Historical Major Failure?Historically, there have been no major security incidents or malfunctions.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The team is actively involved in U.S. cryptocurrency legislation and has submitted ETF applications.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Sec Attitude?Despite active efforts to comply with regulations, the securities nature of the token may still be subject to controversy.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency, and code security scores are moderate.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
C+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Pudgy PenguinsC+ · 53.55 |  xDollar StablecoinC+ · 59.88 |  PixelsC+ · 59.72 |  HashflowC+ · 59.65 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 53.55 | 59.88 | 59.72 | 59.65 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 22.5 | 56.61 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | 60.25 | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 47.67 | 64.15 | 35 | 35 |
| Team Governance | 62.77 | 58.84 | 87.43 | 73.37 |
| Market Ecosystem | 71.65 | 62.2 | 76.12 | 90.7 |
| Security & Compliance | 53.92 | 56.92 | 61.87 | 56.17 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.