Orbs ORBS

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and on-time data delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends have been poor, with few upgrades delivered.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 20 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Adopt a mature proof-of-stake consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%About 6.5 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed data on the quality of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public information on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear token deflationary mechanism was found.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract has additional issuance rights and carries potential inflation risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Staking rate or lock-up rate data are extremely low.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Contracts have rights to issue additional issues, and the supply limit is not fixed.Weight 20%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and VC endorsements.Weight 30%The team has a strong background · 70 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are moderately transparent, with average decentralization.Weight 25%Moderate decentralization · 73 / 100

Financial Transparency?Medium transparency of funds, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%Medium transparent · 73 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract ownership carries centralized risk and is not multi-signature.Weight 20%There is a concentration risk · 30 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, and market participation is average.Weight 30%Moderately active · 65 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream blockchains.Weight 25%Multi-chain Deployment (7) · 85 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of direct DeFi TVL data makes assessment difficult.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?Lack of detailed data on active developer communities.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract has additional issuance rights, posing significant potential security risks.Weight 25%There are potential risks · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Contract issuance rights may lead to unfriendly regulatory attitudes.Weight 30%Unfriendly · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Contract issuance rights may lead to an unfriendly attitude from the SEC.Weight 30%Unfriendly · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency, overall security rating is zero.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100