Movement MOVE

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Despite major events, the development continuity score is extremely low.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of public information about future milestones.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of specific records of delays, but overall delivery scores are low.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a new L1, it is expected to adopt a PoS mechanism, but details are yet to be confirmed.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?The project underwent a major transformation, but faced security risks such as backdoor code.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data and generally low diversity among new L1 clients.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of public token burn or deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?A large number of tokens are unlocked regularly, exerting ongoing inflationary pressure on circulating supply.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of staking data, and the contract shows a very low lock-up ratio.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap, but large unlocks and high concentration of chips.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?The team has recently undergone restructuring and changes in core members, affecting its stability.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Proposal voting and financial transparency scores are high, and governance mechanisms are sound.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proposal voting and treasury transparency are high, but have sparked controversy due to market maker behavior.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold extremely high proportion of tokens, posing centralization risks.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Active Address?High daily active addresses score well, indicating good user engagement.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 84.8 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The token is deployed across multiple chains, but the number of third-party integration projects is zero.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of Movement's own DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Developer community?There is a lack of data on developer community activity, which requires further observation.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There was a market maker dumping scandal, and the contract was found to have backdoor code.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory attitude, but the project has safety compliance red lines.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance, but the project faces safety compliance red lines.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100