Moonbeam GLMR
Moonbeam maintains a strong performance in security, compliance, and market ecosystem, with technical implementation remaining a key focus and currently holding a B+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
B+73.61 / 100
Sector Rank #57 · Global Rank #76
Overall Rating
B+ · 73.61 / 100Roadmap Delivery
69.84
Technical Implementation
65.05
Tokenomics
74.3
Team Governance
67.47
Market Ecosystem
76.52
Security & Compliance
80.47
Overall Score
73.61
Moonbeam has an overall rating B+f B+ (total score 73.61), ranking high in six dimensions for security compliance, market ecosystem, and economic model. The main deduction point is technical implementation (65.05 points)—this dimension is lower than other dimensions in the six-dimensional score.
The rating team concluded: "Moonbeam has relative advantages in security compliance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are mainly in technical implementation." " It is recommended to allocate moderate positions and continuously track subsequent improvements in weak area dimensions.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
70/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The public roadmap delivery information is incomplete and difficult to evaluate.Weight 35%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent detailed upgrade delivery records.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Unclear disclosure of pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
History Extension Record?Historical delay records lack publicly available detailed data.Weight 15%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Technical Implementation
65/100Consensus Mechanism?Inheriting the security of Polkadot relay chains, the consensus mechanism is mature.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed quality assessment data for recent upgrades.Weight 35%55 / 100 · 55 / 100
Client Diversity?Client diversity is limited by the Substrate ecosystem.Weight 20%45 / 100 · 45 / 100
Tokenomics
73.25/100Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanisms have been found in current economic models.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Inflation rate?There is about 5% annualized inflation, which is used for incentives and security.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of publicly available real-time staking rate data, but it is expected to be higher.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict cap on token supply, but there is inflation control.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Team Governance
67/100Core Development Team?Core team members have transparent information and good backgrounds.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Governance mechanisms?On-chain governance mechanisms exist, but the security score is relatively low.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Financial Transparency?Financing information and foundation operations are highly transparent.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?The founders have significant influence, but the team structure is relatively dispersed.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Market Ecosystem
77/100Active Address?Lack of public, real-time active address data.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As an important parallel chain in the Polkadot ecosystem, its ecological position is solid.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of publicly available real-time DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Developer community?As an important parachain, it should have an active developer community.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Security & Compliance
80/100Historical Major Failure?Since the project has been operational, no major public safety incidents have occurred.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The global cryptocurrency regulatory environment is tightening, and projects are facing a cautious approach.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Sec Attitude?The security attributes of GLMR tokens are potentially controversial.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
B+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| MoonbeamB+ · 73.61 |  Nervos NetworkB+ · 79.75 |  THORChainB+ · 79.75 |  dYdXB+ · 79.54 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 73.61 | 79.75 | 79.75 | 79.54 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 69.84 | 80.34 | 75.46 | 75.72 |
| Technical Implementation | 65.05 | 74.45 | 68.55 | 69.95 |
| Tokenomics | 74.3 | 80.4 | 80.1 | 80.1 |
| Team Governance | 67.47 | 81.69 | 85.87 | 85.67 |
| Market Ecosystem | 76.52 | 76.74 | 80.48 | 80.34 |
| Security & Compliance | 80.47 | 83.77 | 85.03 | 83.41 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.