Midas XRP MXRP
Midas XRP leads with roadmap delivery and team governance, with its economic model remaining the main focus, currently holding an E rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
E9.8 / 100
Sector Rank #926 · Global Rank #2362
Overall Rating
E · 9.8 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
2.67
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
9.8
Midas XRP has an overall rating Ef E (total 9.8), ranking high in six dimensions for roadmap delivery, team governance, and market ecosystem. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Midas XRP has relative advantages in roadmap delivery, team governance, and market ecosystem, with current weaknesses focused on its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
10/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data makes it difficult to assess.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public information on recent upgrades, making it impossible to judge.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones have been found, resulting in low transparency.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Technical Implementation
31/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Chain's PoSA mechanism, it balances performance and decentralization.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short operating time and insufficient historical data accumulation.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client diversity data makes assessment impossible.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Tokenomics
20.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflation mechanism design was found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of public inflation rate data, making it impossible to assess.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The proportion of pledged or locked positions is extremely low, resulting in high market liquidity.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
11.5/100Core Development Team?The core team's background information is limited and lacks visibility.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project governance mechanism is centralized, and community participation is low.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
12.5/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is extremely small, and user engagement is insufficient.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports two chains and has certain cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi-type and lacks relevant TVL data.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Developer community?Developer communities are inactive, lacking code contributions.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
20/100Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information and uncertainty.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leaks, and the SEC's attitude may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
E Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Midas XRPE · 9.8 |  FAYAE · 13.3 |  PolkaswapE · 13.3 |  GaleonE · 13.28 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.8 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.28 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 24.75 | 0.9 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 49.6 | 42.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 2.67 | 17.52 | 8.2 | 9.85 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.