Mask Network MASK
Mask Network leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-06
D32.4 / 100
Sector Rank #355 · Global Rank #811
Overall Rating
D · 32.4 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
7.56
Team Governance
86.23
Market Ecosystem
83.83
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
32.4
Mask Network has an overall rating Df D (total 31.97), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Mask Network has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps, milestones, and delivery data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery records.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
50.75/100Consensus Mechanism?As a multi-chain token, it inherits the mature consensus mechanism of the underlying public chain.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The project went live in February 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade quality and impact assessment data.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?As an application layer token, client diversity does not directly apply.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Tokenomics
43.75/100Deflationary Mechanism?The supply is fixed, but no explicit token burn mechanism has been found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?The maximum supply matches the current circulating supply, with no new token inflation.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking or lock-up data, and the top ten holdings are highly concentrated.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Tokens have a clear supply cap and a fixed total supply.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
84.75/100Core Development Team?Team members have good backgrounds, but lack public GitHub activity.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Governance mechanisms?DAO governance using Snapshot offers high transparency.Weight 25%88 / 100 · 88 / 100
Financial Transparency?The project has secured multiple rounds of financing, with high transparency in the use of funds.Weight 25%87 / 100 · 87 / 100
Concentration of key people?Core team members are clear, but there is a lack of detailed information about multisig addresses.Weight 20%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Market Ecosystem
77.5/100Active Address?The number of active addresses performed well, indicating high user engagement.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
DeFi TVL?As a portal project, it has no direct TVL but is integrated with the DeFi ecosystem.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Developer community?Public GitHub repositories have low activity, and developer community engagement needs improvement.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Security & Compliance
21/100Historical Major Failure?The contract has internal identifier=1 and permission leakage, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The overall cryptocurrency regulatory environment is tightening, and projects face uncertainty.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's classification and regulatory stance on crypto assets remain uncertain.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?It lacks data on client bug frequencies but has serious security issues such as backdoor code.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Mask NetworkD · 32.4 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 32.4 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 7.56 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 86.23 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 83.83 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.