Lorenzo Protocol BANK
Lorenzo Protocol leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a solid D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D30.17 / 100
Sector Rank #371 · Global Rank #944
Overall Rating
D · 30.17 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
31.74
Team Governance
79.97
Market Ecosystem
57.26
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
30.17
Lorenzo Protocol has an overall rating Df D (total score 30.36), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Lorenzo Protocol has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are mainly in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of detailed information about recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of project delays.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
28.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Chain's PoSA consensus mechanism, it is highly efficient.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short operating time and insufficient historical data accumulation.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of diversity data on project clients themselves.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Tokenomics
30/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism, but its strength is limited.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Inflation rate?Tokens can be minted, and the current circulating supply is far below the maximum supply.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear staking or lock-up data may result in a low proportion.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap, but the current circulating supply is well below the cap.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Team Governance
58.04/100Core Development Team?The core team has a strong background and VC support.Weight 30%79 / 100 · 79.3 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project has low decentralization and a relatively centralized governance mechanism.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Financial Transparency?High financial transparency is conducive to community oversight.Weight 25%81 / 100 · 81 / 100
Concentration of key people?There is a risk of concentrated permissions for key individuals or addresses.Weight 20%45 / 100 · 45 / 100
Market Ecosystem
36/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Cross-chain interoperability scores are extremely low, limiting ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%4 / 100 · 4 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project's own DeFi TVL data is insufficient and it is not a pure DeFi project.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public developer activity data and low community activity.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
22.5/100Historical Major Failure?There are currently no publicly disclosed major safety fault records, and the safety score is good.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, and there is a risk of permission leakage.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?Tokens can be issued additionally, raising potential controversy over their securities attributes.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to assess stability.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Lorenzo ProtocolD · 30.17 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 30.17 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 31.74 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 79.97 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 57.26 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.