Loopring LRC
Loopring leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D29.18 / 100
Sector Rank #196 · Global Rank #1012
Overall Rating
D · 29.18 / 100Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
16.97
Team Governance
74.7
Market Ecosystem
61.77
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
29.18
Loopring has an overall rating Df D (total 28.7), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Loopring has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
10/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public data, but overall development activity is low.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are not active, with few upgrades and deliveries.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of public data, suggesting many pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data, suggesting there are records of delays.Weight 15%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Technical Implementation
66.75/100Consensus Mechanism?As an Ethereum L2, it inherits the security of its PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has run for a long time, accumulating rich operational experience.Weight 15%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed data on the quality of the latest upgrades.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As a specific protocol, client diversity is limited.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Tokenomics
15.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear token burn or value capture mechanisms.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Although there is a supply cap, the lack of strong deflationary mechanisms means its contribution to value capture is limited.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, liquidity is high, and there is a lack of staking incentives.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply cap, but its contribution to value capture is limited.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Team Governance
77.5/100Core Development Team?Core team members have good backgrounds but low execution scores.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are sound, and community participation is high.Weight 25%89 / 100 · 89 / 100
Financial Transparency?High transparency in fund usage, and a sound community supervision mechanism.Weight 25%89 / 100 · 89 / 100
Concentration of key people?The core team has a moderate number of members, but potential concentration risks should be watched.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Market Ecosystem
56.68/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is strong, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%91 / 100 · 90.6 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple chains, with good ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
DeFi TVL?The total value locked in DeFi is relatively low, and the ecosystem scale needs to be expanded.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Developer community?Developer community activity is low, and GitHub data is missing.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?In 2024, it suffered a major hacker attack, causing significant losses.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leaks, and regulatory attitudes are unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are serious security risks, and the SEC's stance may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of public data, but overall safety is poor.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| LoopringD · 29.18 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 29.18 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 16.97 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 74.7 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 61.77 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.