Liquity LQTY
Liquity leads with team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D30.52 / 100
Sector Rank #424 · Global Rank #916
Overall Rating
D · 30.52 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
24.84
Team Governance
90.46
Market Ecosystem
58.85
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
30.52
Liquity has an overall rating Df D (total 30.8), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Liquity has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and milestone delivery data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Only one major upgrade is recorded; it's impossible to assess the achievement of nearly four rounds.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No clear pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public information on historical project delays.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
81.75/100Consensus Mechanism?As an Ethereum L2 protocol, it inherits its mature PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been online since April 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Recent upgrades?The V2 version will launch in 2025, but lacks specific quality assessment data.Weight 35%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Client Diversity?As a protocol, its security depends on the underlying chain and has security score audits.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Tokenomics
42.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?Tokens are mainly used for fee income and incentives, with no explicit burn mechanism.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?The total supply matches the maximum supply, and the circulating supply is close to the upper limit.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?LQTY tokens have no significant staking or locking data, resulting in poor liquidity management.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?The token has a hard supply cap of 100 million.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
89/100Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, backed by well-known VCs.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The protocol is designed to be immutable, reducing the attack surface and providing high security score governance intensity.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Financial Transparency?High scores for financial transparency indicate sound financial management.Weight 25%88 / 100 · 88 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses have moderate holding ratios and carry certain concentration risks.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Market Ecosystem
62.4/100Active Address?High daily active addresses score well, indicating good user engagement.Weight 30%83 / 100 · 83 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on two chains, but with low cross-chain liquidity and third-party integration.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
DeFi TVL?The total value locked by the protocol is moderate, giving it a certain status in the DeFi sector.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Developer community?GitHub activity data is missing, but it still has some community attention.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There is a risk of proxy contract and permission leakage, triggering a safety red line.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?As a DeFi protocol, it faces cautious regulatory attitudes and has a low compliance score.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC has disputes over the securities nature of DeFi protocols, with high compliance risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There is a risk of privileged function sensitivity and zero multisignature ratio.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| LiquityD · 30.52 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 30.52 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 24.84 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 90.46 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 58.85 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.