Lagrange LA
Lagrange leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D27.82 / 100
Sector Rank #540 · Global Rank #1107
Overall Rating
D · 27.82 / 100Roadmap Delivery
30
Tokenomics
0.62
Team Governance
51.6
Market Ecosystem
71.33
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
27.82
Lagrange has an overall rating Df D (total 27.82), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Lagrange has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
28.75/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public delivery data, and recent development activity trends are zero.Weight 35%25 / 100 · 25 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There have been no recent public major upgrades, and development activities have stalled.Weight 30%25 / 100 · 25 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No public information clearly lists milestones to be delivered.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of transparent delivery records suggests a risk of delays.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Technical Implementation
40/100Consensus Mechanism?As a ZK coprocessor, security depends on the underlying L1 consensus.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet and token will launch in June 2025, with a relatively short runtime.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information on recent upgrades, and the trend of development activity is zero.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?As a ZK coprocessor, it is usually implemented using a single official client.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
0.62/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear token burn or value capture mechanisms.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?The total supply far exceeds the circulating supply, and future unlocking will bring huge inflationary pressure.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, the market circulation is large, and there is a lack of staking incentives.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a fixed cap, the gap between circulating supply and total supply is large, resulting in concentrated distribution.Weight 20%3 / 100 · 3.1 / 100
Team Governance
51.5/100Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and have received investment support from well-known VC institutions.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Currently, the project adopts a centralized governance model, with a low degree of decentralization.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Financial Transparency?Transparency in fund management and proposal voting is high.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?Project governance is centralized, with decision-making power concentrated among key individuals.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
71.5/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on Ethereum and BSC, with cross-chain potential.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
DeFi TVL?It lacks direct data on total DeFi locked value, but the ecosystem remains highly active.Weight 25%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Developer community?Recently, developer activity has shown zero activity and low community activity.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract contained backdoor code and permission leaks, posing significant security risks.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?A regulatory compliance score of zero indicates serious regulatory issues for the project.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lack of SEC compliance information, combined with overall regulatory scores, leads to an unfriendly attitude.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lacking data on client bug frequency, but with serious security vulnerabilities.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| LagrangeD · 27.82 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 27.82 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 30 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0.62 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 51.6 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 71.33 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.