Rave KRAV

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There are no recent mainnet upgrades, only testnet events.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of historical delivery records makes it impossible to assess delays.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a token on the Base chain, it inherits Ethereum PoS consensus security.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has been running stably.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent updates on token contracts or applications.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?As an on-chain token on the Base chain, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The huge potential supply differs greatly from the current circulating supply, raising inflation risks.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Staking or lock-up is zero, lacking user engagement and value locking.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a fixed supply cap, but chips are highly concentrated and unevenly distributed.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Team background and VC endorsement scores are low, and there is a lack of public information.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project is not decentralized, and governance mechanisms lack transparency.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Financial Transparency?There is a lack of public information on financial transparency, making it impossible to assess the situation.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Concentration of key people?The project is not decentralized, which may pose risks of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely low, and user engagement is insufficient.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on the Base chain, with low cross-chain and third-party integration.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi's total locked value is extremely low, and its ecosystem lacks appeal.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of a public GitHub repository means developer community activity is low.Weight 20%5 / 100 · 5 / 100

Historical Major Failure?So far, no major security incidents have been found.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory compliance information, resulting in extremely low compliance scores.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lacking clear SEC stance, but low compliance scores, leading to controversy.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Audit coverage is moderate, privileged function sensitivity is high, and code quality is acceptable.Weight 15%83 / 100 · 83 / 100