JACK JACK
JACK leads with security compliance and roadmap delivery, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D-21.73 / 100
Sector Rank #83 · Global Rank #1565
Overall Rating
D- · 21.73 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
1.5
Security & Compliance
41.48
Overall Score
21.73
JACK Overall Rating D- (total 21.73), ranking high in six dimensions for security compliance, roadmap delivery, and team governance. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "JACK has relative advantages in security compliance, roadmap delivery, and team governance, with current weaknesses focused on the economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
27/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and on-time data delivery.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are zero, and upgrade completion is poor.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Technical Implementation
51/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on the mature Avalanche C-Chain, the consensus mechanism is stable.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has already passed the initial stage.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade details and code activity data.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data poses potential centralization risks.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
20/100Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of clear inflation data, but overall economic models score extremely low.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of effective staking or lock-up data, resulting in extremely low lock-up ratios.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
22.5/100Core Development Team?Core team background and VC endorsement scores are relatively low.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project is not marked as decentralized and lacks governance transparency data.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of data on fund usage and transparency in proposal voting.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold extremely high proportions, posing centralization risks.Weight 20%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Market Ecosystem
7.5/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely low, and the market is insufficiently active.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?There are zero third-party integrations, and the ecosystem has poor scalability.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?Despite some TVL, its value capture ability is weak, and its contribution to the ecosystem is limited.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Developer community?Recent development activity trends are zero, and developer communities are inactive.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
45/100Historical Major Failure?Historically, no major safety red line events have been triggered.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance data and ambiguous attitudes.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lack of SEC-related compliance data, unclear attitude.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to assess stability.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| JACKD- · 21.73 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 21.73 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 1.5 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 41.48 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.