Injective INJ
Injective leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a D+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D+33.58 / 100
Sector Rank #165 · Global Rank #752
Overall Rating
D+ · 33.58 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
23.2
Team Governance
64.29
Market Ecosystem
65.13
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
33.58
Injective overall rating D+ (total 33.62), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Injective has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
36/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public milestone delivery data makes it difficult to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There have been significant recent upgrades, but development activity data remains low.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Technical Implementation
73.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Adopts a mature Tendermint PoS consensus mechanism with high security.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?Recently, there have been mainnet upgrades and EVM compatibility, but lacking innovative details.Weight 35%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public information about client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
79.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?Governance proposals are implemented through deflationary mechanisms and include a token burn plan.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of public inflation rate data, but there are deflationary mechanisms.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The staking rate reaches half of the total supply, indicating high community participation.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?A fixed supply cap helps stabilize long-term value.Weight 20%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Team Governance
70.75/100Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and are backed by well-known VCs.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Adopting PoS on-chain governance results in high community participation and a high proposal approval rate.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Financial Transparency?Secured multiple rounds of financing and investments from well-known institutions, with ample capital reserves.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold too high a proportion of coins, posing centralization risks.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
60.75/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is considerable, indicating a solid user base.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple chains, but scores relatively low in third-party integrations.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lacking Injective native DeFi TVL data, DeFi scores are average.Weight 25%55 / 100 · 55 / 100
Developer community?GitHub development activity data is missing or low, raising doubts about community activity.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leakage, and the security level is extremely low.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There are serious security loopholes, and regulatory attitudes may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are serious security vulnerabilities, and the SEC's stance may be controversial or unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency and serious security vulnerabilities.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| InjectiveD+ · 33.58 |  wojakD+ · 39.93 |  Polyhedra NetworkD+ · 39.91 |  yesnoerrorD+ · 39.9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 33.58 | 39.93 | 39.91 | 39.9 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 23.2 | 23.58 | 41.25 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 64.29 | 30 | 75.16 | 34.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 65.13 | 70 | 70.72 | 71.33 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 50.54 | 0 | 58.05 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.