Circle USYC USYC
Circle USYC leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding an E rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
E6.8 / 100
Sector Rank #1500 · Global Rank #2531
Overall Rating
E · 6.8 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
45.2
Market Ecosystem
4.05
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
6.8
Circle USYC overall rating E (overall 6.8), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Circle USYC has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery, with current weaknesses mainly focused on roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of roadmap and on-time data delivery makes assessment impossible.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent upgrade delivery data is missing and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of pending delivery milestone information makes it impossible to assess.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
4.5/100Consensus Mechanism?USYC is a token with no native consensus mechanism and relies on the underlying chain.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Main network years of operation?Released in December 2024, it has a relatively short runtime.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of token contract upgrade information makes it impossible to assess upgrade quality.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?USYC is a token with no client-side diversity concept.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Tokenomics
0/100Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?As stablecoins, the supply is controlled by the issuer, but the chips are highly concentrated.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No token staking or lock-up mechanisms have been found.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Supply is linked to reserves, but chips are highly concentrated, posing risks.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Team Governance
43/100Core Development Team?The core team has some background, but its scale and influence are limited.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are moderately transparent, but decision-making power is highly concentrated.Weight 25%68 / 100 · 68 / 100
Financial Transparency?Transparency of funds is moderate and needs further improvement.Weight 25%68 / 100 · 68 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold 100% of the tokens, indicating a very high concentration.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
7.52/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely low, and user engagement is insufficient.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0.08 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains, providing a certain foundation for cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of token staking data in DeFi, and low third-party integration.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Developer community?Lack of developer community activity data and low third-party integration.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
12.75/100Historical Major Failure?Backdoor code and permission leaks trigger a security red line.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There are serious safety issues, and regulators may take a cautious approach.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are serious security concerns, and the SEC may take a cautious approach.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Audit coverage is high, but critical security vulnerabilities still exist.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
E Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Circle USYCE · 6.8 |  FAYAE · 13.3 |  PolkaswapE · 13.3 |  GaleonE · 13.28 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 6.8 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.28 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 24.75 | 0.9 |
| Team Governance | 45.2 | 30 | 49.6 | 42.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 4.05 | 17.52 | 8.2 | 9.85 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.