FC Porto PORTO
FC Porto leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-24.56 / 100
Sector Rank #540 · Global Rank #1358
Overall Rating
D- · 24.56 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
28
Team Governance
48.4
Market Ecosystem
53.98
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
24.56
FC Porto has an overall rating D-f D (total 26.09), ranking high in market ecology, team governance, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "FC Porto has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and milestone information.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?No recent public upgrade deliveries have been found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of historical roadmap delivery records.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
66/100Consensus Mechanism?Runs on the BNB Smart Chain and uses PoSA consensus.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Main network years of operation?Relying on BNB Smart Chain, the mainnet has a relatively long runtime.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?The token itself has no major upgrades and relies on the BNB Smart Chain.Weight 35%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Client Diversity?BNB Smart Chain clients are generally diverse.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Tokenomics
33.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a large number of uncirculated tokens, which could unlock inflationary pressures in the future.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No staking or lock-up mechanisms were found, resulting in concentrated liquidity.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
40.75/100Core Development Team?No active public core development team was found.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Fan token holders can participate in voting on certain club decisions.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Financial Transparency?Funding transparency is acceptable, but there is still room for improvement.Weight 25%76 / 100 · 76 / 100
Concentration of key people?Tokens are highly concentrated in a few addresses, posing centralization risks.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
40.6/100Active Address?The number of active addresses performed moderately.Weight 30%77 / 100 · 77 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed only on a single chain, with limited ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
DeFi TVL?The token itself lacks a DeFi ecosystem and relies on the underlying chain.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Developer community?No active developer community or code contributions were found.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, and there is a risk of backdoor code.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leaks, and the SEC has taken an unfriendly stance.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There are serious issues with overall safety compliance.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| FC PortoD- · 24.56 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 24.56 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 48.4 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 53.98 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.