Falcon Finance FF
Falcon Finance leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D28.06 / 100
Sector Rank #533 · Global Rank #1094
Overall Rating
D · 28.06 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
52.8
Market Ecosystem
67.71
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
28.06
Falcon Finance has an overall rating Df D (total 28.06), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Falcon Finance has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
38.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of a public roadmap, but visible delivery events that cannot be precisely assessed.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Several important products and features have recently launched, such as the mainnet and insurance funds.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of a public roadmap, making it impossible to assess the extent of historical delays.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
42/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on mature PoSA/PoS mechanisms, it offers high security.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The main network operation time is short, and it still takes time to verify the stability.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of code upgrade information, and stablecoins have experienced depeging.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?As a token project, client diversity is not suitable or data is missing.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Tokenomics
6.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?Contracts can be issued in incremental quantities, but there is a lack of a clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Contracts can be issued additionally, and a large number of tokens remain uncirculated, posing high inflation risks.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, lacking long-term holding incentives.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply cap, but contracts can be issued additionally, and the cap may be breached.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Team Governance
34.75/100Core Development Team?Team members come from diverse backgrounds, but core development information is not transparent.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Contracts are controlled by a single address, with centralized governance mechanisms.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Financial Transparency?Transparency in funding sources and usage is high.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contracts are controlled by a single address, posing the risk of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
66.78/100Active Address?A high number of daily active addresses indicates active user engagement.Weight 30%98 / 100 · 97.6 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports two mainstream chains, with good ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
DeFi TVL?It has a high total DeFi value locked and an active ecosystem.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public data on developer community activities.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
23.5/100Historical Major Failure?Stablecoins have been depegging multiple times, indicating security or mechanism risks.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?DeFi projects generally face regulatory prudence.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Sec Attitude?There may be securities disputes regarding the token's attributes, and the SEC's stance remains unclear.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client code and bug report data.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Falcon FinanceD · 28.06 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 28.06 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 52.8 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 67.71 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.