Doodles DOOD
Doodles leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding a D+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D+39.67 / 100
Sector Rank #53 · Global Rank #507
Overall Rating
D+ · 39.67 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
35
Team Governance
61.57
Market Ecosystem
82.48
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
39.67
Doodles overall rating D+ (total 39.47), ranking high in six dimensions for market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Doodles has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37.51/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity and upgrade trend data are zero.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records, leading to conservative assessments.Weight 15%67 / 100 · 66.7 / 100
Technical Implementation
46/100Consensus Mechanism?Token security depends on the mature consensus mechanism of the underlying public chain.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The token has been up for a short time and lacks experience in mainnet operation.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade activity data and low development continuity.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?Diversity of token clients depends on the underlying public chain.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Tokenomics
35/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear data on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a large amount of uncirculated supply, and potential inflationary pressures are expected in the future.Weight 25%24 / 100 · 24 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No clear staking or lock-up mechanisms were found.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
43.29/100Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and are recognized by venture capital.Weight 30%79 / 100 · 79.3 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are highly centralized, with limited community participation.Weight 25%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Financial Transparency?Low transparency of funds, and insufficient information on proposal voting.Weight 25%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contracts have an agent model, which may lead to centralized access to key individuals.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
67/100Active Address?A high daily active address score indicates good user activity.Weight 30%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains, with broad ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not a DeFi protocol, so the TVL metric is not directly applicable.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Developer community?There is a lack of public developer activity data, and the number of third-party integrations is low.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract contains backdoor code, triggering a security red line and posing significant security risks.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance data and low VASP/KYC scores.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear SEC characterization, and there are potential disputes over the nature of securities.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency and conservative assessment.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| DoodlesD+ · 39.67 |  wojakD+ · 39.93 |  Polyhedra NetworkD+ · 39.91 |  yesnoerrorD+ · 39.9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 39.67 | 39.93 | 39.91 | 39.9 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 35 | 23.58 | 41.25 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 61.57 | 30 | 75.16 | 34.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 82.48 | 70 | 70.72 | 71.33 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 50.54 | 0 | 58.05 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.