COTI COTI
COTI leads thanks to its team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a solid D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D26.92 / 100
Sector Rank #222 · Global Rank #1176
Overall Rating
D · 26.92 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
18.3
Team Governance
71.68
Market Ecosystem
59.41
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
26.92
COTI overall rating D (total 25.54), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "COTI has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery data makes it impossible to assess project progress.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear information on pending development milestones.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical project delay records, making it impossible to conduct evaluations.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
61/100Consensus Mechanism?COTI V2, as an Ethereum L2, utilizes advanced cryptographic technology.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been online since November 2019 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific data on the quality of recent upgrades, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data may pose concentration risks.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
19.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?Tokens have the ability to issue additional tokens but lack a clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Tokens can be issued additionally, posing potential inflation risks.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, staking rate data is insufficient, and liquidity risk is high.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a maximum supply, but its positive impact can be reduced by increasing its output.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Team Governance
69.63/100Core Development Team?Core members have good backgrounds, but lack data on development activity.Weight 30%62 / 100 · 62.1 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Safety scores include higher governance intensity and authenticity.Weight 25%86 / 100 · 86 / 100
Financial Transparency?High scores for fund transparency, and open financing information.Weight 25%86 / 100 · 86 / 100
Concentration of key people?Nearly half of the top ten non-treasury holder addresses are highly concentrated.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Market Ecosystem
34.59/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is moderate, with a certain user base.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75.3 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly serving as an Ethereum L2, it has relatively low cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data within the COTI ecosystem makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Developer community?The number of GitHub repositories and merged PRs is zero, and the developer community is inactive.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?Tokens can be issued additionally, posing serious security risks and triggering red lines.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Labeled as potential securities with risks of additional issuance, and regulatory attitudes are unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?Flagged as potential securities with risks of additional issuance, the SEC has taken an unfriendly stance.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of client bug data, but overall security is compromised by the risk of additional issuance.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| COTID · 26.92 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 26.92 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 18.3 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 71.68 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 59.41 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.