Cookie DAO COOKIE
Cookie DAO leads in market ecosystem and security compliance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C-44.05 / 100
Sector Rank #114 · Global Rank #356
Overall Rating
C- · 44.05 / 100Roadmap Delivery
30
Tokenomics
6.77
Team Governance
52.8
Market Ecosystem
61.34
Security & Compliance
58.46
Overall Score
44.05
Cookie DAO has an overall rating C-f C (total 44.05), ranking high in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance across six dimensions. The main points of deduction are the economic model (6.77 points)—mainly influenced by medium- to short-term selling pressure (0 points) and value capture (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Cookie DAO has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
29.25/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project has undergone multiple transformations recently, with some functions ceasing operations.Weight 30%25 / 100 · 25 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?The project is in a transitional phase, with unclear public milestones.Weight 20%25 / 100 · 25 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of clear documentation, but the project transformation suggests plans to change.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Technical Implementation
64.5/100Consensus Mechanism?It relies on mature Ethereum and BSC consensus mechanisms.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The main network operation time of the project is relatively short.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Recent upgrades?The project is in a period of transformation and lacks details of recent technological upgrades.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Diversity?It inherits the good client diversity of the underlying public blockchain.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Tokenomics
8/100Deflationary Mechanism?The data does not mention a clear token deflation mechanism.Weight 30%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Inflation rate?Economic models lack value capture and demand logic.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of clear staking or lock-up data, and the lock-up ratio is extremely low.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Although there is an upper limit, flaws in economic model design affect its value.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Team Governance
53/100Core Development Team?Limited disclosure of core team information, background unknown.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There is a decentralized autonomous organization governance mechanism with good authenticity.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is limited to a single address, resulting in a very low multi-signature ratio.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
60.05/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses performed well.Weight 30%86 / 100 · 86 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of TVL data for projects themselves, and they are not core DeFi projects.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public codebase, and extremely low developer activity data.Weight 20%15 / 100 · 15 / 100
Security & Compliance
60/100Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information results in lower compliance scores.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Sec Attitude?The lack of clear SEC statements and a generally cautious regulatory environmentWeight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Relying on the stability of the underlying chain, the contract passes security score audits.Weight 15%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Cookie DAOC- · 44.05 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 44.05 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 30 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 6.77 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 52.8 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 61.34 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 58.46 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.