Civic CVC

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap milestone data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, GitHub development activity has shown zero trends, with no significant upgrades observed.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical roadmap extensions.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an ERC-20 token, its security relies on the mature PoS consensus mechanisms of Ethereum and Polygon.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?Since its launch in 2017, the project has operated its mainnet for a long time, accumulating extensive experience.Weight 15%95 / 100 · 95 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information about recent upgrades and code activity data makes it impossible to assess quality.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token, its client diversity depends on the Ethereum and Polygon ecosystems, and overall performance is strong.Weight 20%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, posing potential inflationary pressures from future token releases.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No clear token staking or lock-up mechanisms have been found, and the proportion of locked holders is extremely low.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The total token supply is fixed at 1 billion, with a clear cap.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds, backed by well-known investment institutions, and the team has high visibility.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project governance mechanism is relatively centralized, but its safety score and governance intensity score are relatively high, and transparency is acceptable.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Excellent transparency score, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contracts have a proxy model, which may lead to centralized permissions and pose potential risks.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is moderate, indicating decent user engagement.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project supports multiple mainstream blockchains, expanding its ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Civic is not a major DeFi project and lacks direct TVL data, but its identity solutions may indirectly serve DeFi.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

Developer community?GitHub data is missing, and public developer communities are less active.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Safety Score: The safety score is relatively high, and no public records of major security incidents have been found.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory compliance data, and the crypto asset regulatory environment is generally cautious.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC disputes the securities attributes of most tokens, and the projects lack clear non-securities presumptions.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The contract carries backdoor code risks that can lead to serious security issues.Weight 15%10 / 100 · 10 / 100