Centrifuge CFG
Centrifuge leads with its market ecosystem and team governance performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-23.33 / 100
Sector Rank #755 · Global Rank #1461
Overall Rating
D- · 23.33 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
19.17
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
66.34
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
23.33
Centrifuge has a comprehensive rating of D (total 23.33), ranking high in market ecology, team governance, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Centrifuge has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and economic model, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of technical upgrade details makes it impossible to assess delivery status.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public pending delivery milestone information makes it impossible to assess future plans.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?The lack of publicly available historical delay records makes it impossible to assess project management capabilities.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
48/100Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature Ethereum PoS mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short runtime, and historical data accumulation and stability verification are insufficient.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data poses potential centralization risks.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
19.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Inflation rate?The contract has additional issuance rights and carries potential inflation risks.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?On-chain data shows that the token lock rate is extremely low.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict supply cap for tokens, so additional issuance is possible.Weight 20%45 / 100 · 45 / 100
Team Governance
30/100Core Development Team?Team members come from diverse backgrounds and have endorsements from well-known VCs.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of public, detailed information on governance mechanisms.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of transparency in fund usage prevents assessment of fund management.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Concentration of key people?The contract has the ability to hide the owner and change balance status.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
66.65/100Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%86 / 100 · 85.5 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains, with a strong cross-chain ecosystem.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi has a relatively high total value locked, indicating that the project has a certain scale in the RWA sector.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Developer community?Developer activity data is missing or activity levels are low.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There have been incidents of social media accounts being hacked, with permission leakage red-line vulnerabilities.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory attitude information and safety red lines.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear SEC stance and safety red lines.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of client bug frequency data and a security red line.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| CentrifugeD- · 23.33 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 23.33 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 19.17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 66.34 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.