BounceBit BB
BounceBit leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a C+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
C+55.69 / 100
Sector Rank #102 · Global Rank #208
Overall Rating
C+ · 55.69 / 100Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
49.48
Team Governance
85.74
Market Ecosystem
71.2
Security & Compliance
55.62
Overall Score
55.69
BounceBit has an overall rating C+f C (total 56.86), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction was roadmap delivery (11.25 points)—mainly influenced by sub-factors such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "BounceBit has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
11/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public data and poor sustainability of development activities.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are zero, with no significant upgrades.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public data and poor sustainability of development activities.Weight 20%15 / 100 · 15 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public data and poor sustainability of development activities.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Technical Implementation
56/100Consensus Mechanism?It uses PoS dual-token staking combined with BTC security.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but is now running stably.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade quality data and sluggish development activity.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data, and new chains are usually low-profile.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Tokenomics
48/100Deflationary Mechanism?Platform fees are used for BB buybacks, which has a deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of clear inflation rate data, but significant unlocking pressure exists.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?As a restaking chain, staking is the core, but staking rate data is not transparent.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling and the total is fixed.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
84/100Core Development Team?The core team has a strong background and is backed by top VCs.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Lack of public governance mechanisms, market data shows it is not decentralized.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of details on financial transparency, but there are financing records and VC endorsements.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?The concentration of key figures is relatively low, which is beneficial for decentralization.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Market Ecosystem
73/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, indicating high market activity.Weight 30%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple chains, but the number of third-party integrations is relatively low.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi has a relatively high total locked value, indicating a certain market appeal.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Developer community?Lack of developer community data, and zero development activity trends.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Security & Compliance
55.5/100Historical Major Failure?There are currently no major security incident records, and no safety red line has been triggered.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory stance and uncertainty in the restaking sector.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Sec Attitude?Without a clear SEC stance, restaking tokens may face securities identification disputes.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?It lacks data on client bug frequency, but its security score is relatively high.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
C+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| BounceBitC+ · 55.69 |  xDollar StablecoinC+ · 59.88 |  PixelsC+ · 59.72 |  HashflowC+ · 59.65 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 55.69 | 59.88 | 59.72 | 59.65 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 56.61 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | 60.25 | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 49.48 | 64.15 | 35 | 35 |
| Team Governance | 85.74 | 58.84 | 87.43 | 73.37 |
| Market Ecosystem | 71.2 | 62.2 | 76.12 | 90.7 |
| Security & Compliance | 55.62 | 56.92 | 61.87 | 56.17 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.