Bio Protocol BIO
Bio Protocol leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-06
C-41.77 / 100
Sector Rank #155 · Global Rank #433
Overall Rating
C- · 41.77 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
44.48
Team Governance
74.57
Market Ecosystem
76.22
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
41.77
Bio Protocol has an overall rating C-f C (total score 43.42), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Bio Protocol has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and economic model, but current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
39/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There have been two clear recent protocol upgrades.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
History Extension Record?There have been records of delays in team token unlocks.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
58/100Consensus Mechanism?As a multi-chain token, it relies on the underlying public chain consensus mechanism.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Main network years of operation?The main network operation time of the project is relatively short.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Recent upgrades?Recent upgrades lack specific quality data.Weight 35%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Client Diversity?As tokens, client diversity depends on the underlying public chain.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Tokenomics
35.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism, but the contract can issue additional tokens.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a risk of additional issuance in the future, and specific inflation rate data is missing.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The contract shows a very low proportion of lock-up holders.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a nominal supply cap, but the contract can issue additional tokens.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Team Governance
62.5/100Core Development Team?Core team members have clear backgrounds and relevant experience.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are relatively centralized, with high scores for internal processes.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Financial Transparency?Financing information is open and transparent, and fund management is highly transparent.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated at a single address, lacking multisig.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
58/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project's total DeFi value locked is relatively low.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public developer activity data leads to low development activity.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
29.5/100Historical Major Failure?The contract has additional issuance rights, posing potential security risks.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information, failure to follow VASP/KYC.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Sec Attitude?Project categories may face SEC scrutiny, and the stance remains uncertain.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Bio ProtocolC- · 41.77 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 41.77 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 44.48 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 74.57 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 76.22 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.