Biconomy BICO
Biconomy leads thanks to its market ecosystem and team governance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a solid D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D32.32 / 100
Sector Rank #362 · Global Rank #818
Overall Rating
D · 32.32 / 100Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
75.07
Market Ecosystem
89.33
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
32.32
Biconomy has an overall rating Df D (total 32.01), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Biconomy has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
10.75/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public data on on-time delivery rates, and development activity is inactive.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent upgrade delivery records are unclear, and development activity is relatively low.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of clear historical delay records, but development activity remains inactive.Weight 15%15 / 100 · 15 / 100
Technical Implementation
43.5/100Consensus Mechanism?As a relay network, it adopts a hybrid consensus mechanism and operates stably.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating a certain level of stability.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade information and active development records.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Client Diversity?As a relay network, client-side diversity data is either unsuitable or missing.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
0/100Deflationary Mechanism?No clear token deflationary mechanism was found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There are token unlocks and releases, with high concentration, creating selling pressure.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The staking rate is extremely low, with the top ten token-holding addresses having a concentration as high as 98.7%.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a hard top, token allocation is extremely concentrated, affecting its effectiveness.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Team Governance
72/100Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, with good backgrounds.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There is a governance mechanism, but the degree of project decentralization is low.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Financial Transparency?Transparency in funding sources and usage is high.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?The project has low decentralization and carries the risk of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Market Ecosystem
71.4/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is good, and the ecosystem is active.Weight 30%98 / 100 · 98 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream public chains and L2s, offering high integration.Weight 25%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project's own TVL is low, and the ecosystem application TVL data is insufficient.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Developer community?GitHub activity data is missing, but there is a certain level of developer activity.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There is a risk of backdoor code and permission leakage, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?When the safety red line is triggered, regulatory attitudes may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The safety red line is triggered, and the SEC's stance may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Despite audits, backdoor code and permission leaks remain serious security issues.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| BiconomyD · 32.32 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 32.32 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 75.07 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 89.33 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.