
Berachain BERA
Berachain leads in team governance and security compliance, with technical implementation remaining a key focus and currently holding a B rating.
Sector Rank #77 · Global Rank #103
Overall Rating
B · 70.9 / 100Berachain has an overall rating Bf B (total score 70.9), ranking high in team governance, security compliance, and market ecosystem across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is technical implementation (68.05 points)—a dimension lower than other dimensions in the six-dimensional score.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Berachain has relative advantages in team governance, security compliance, and market ecosystem, but its current shortcomings are mainly in technical implementation." " It is recommended to allocate moderate positions and continuously track subsequent improvements in weak area dimensions.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
70.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Mainnet launches and early upgrades are proceeding as planned, but there is a lack of public, detailed roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There have been significant recent upgrades and proposals, but there was an emergency network pause for repairs.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public, detailed pending delivery milestone information, making assessment difficult.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
History Extension Record?Historically, there has been no clear major delay, but there was one emergency network shutdown.Weight 15%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Technical Implementation
64.75/100Consensus Mechanism?Adopts an innovative liquidity proof mechanism and is based on the mature Tendermint.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short operating time and is still in the early stages of development.Weight 15%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Recent upgrades?The most recent major incident was an emergency fix of a vulnerability, indicating a security vulnerability in the system.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As a chain based on the Cosmos SDK, its client diversity may not be as diverse as other mature public chains.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Tokenomics
62/100Deflationary Mechanism?Currently, no clear token burning or fixed deflation mechanism has been found.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Inflation rate?The inflation rate of the governance token BGT is controllable, but the inflation data for the BERA token is unclear.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a relatively high token lock-up ratio, which is beneficial for market stability.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is an initial total supply of tokens, but no strict supply cap is clearly set.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Team Governance
78.25/100Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, and remain active within the community.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Governance mechanisms?It has clear governance tokens and proposal processes, and high community participation.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Financial Transparency?Project financing information is disclosed, and investor backgrounds are strong.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?There are core founders, but the team members have clear divisions of responsibilities and moderate concentration.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Market Ecosystem
66/100Active Address?There is a lack of direct active address data, but as a new ecosystem, it is expected to be in a growth phase.Weight 30%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The Berachain ecosystem is actively being built to attract projects to join.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lacking direct DeFi TVL data, the new chain is still expected to be in the early accumulation stage.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Developer community?Social media is active, but there is a lack of public data contributed by GitHub developers.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Security & Compliance
64.5/100Historical Major Failure?There was a major security breach that caused network downtime, but the team responded promptly and recovered funds.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory stance, but as a public chain, it usually faces a neutral or somewhat cautious regulatory environment.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Sec Attitude?Although the SEC lacks a clear statement, as a new L1 project, there are potential risks of attracting SEC attention.Weight 30%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of public data on client bug frequency, but ecosystem applications have experienced vulnerabilities.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
B Peer Comparison
Export CSV BerachainB · 70.9 | VictionB · 73.33 | FlowB · 73.28 | ARKB · 73.17 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70.9 | 73.33 | 73.28 | 73.17 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 69.9 | 74.5 | 72.23 | 72.78 |
| Technical Implementation | 68.05 | 71.7 | 65.5 | 64.7 |
| Tokenomics | 70.3 | 81 | 76.3 | 76.3 |
| Team Governance | 74.35 | 72.62 | 72.14 | 72.8 |
| Market Ecosystem | 71.3 | 69.85 | 75.83 | 74 |
| Security & Compliance | 71.65 | 71.62 | 74.86 | 75.79 |



Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.