Avantis AVNT
Avantis stands out thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a C rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C50.1 / 100
Sector Rank #47 · Global Rank #246
Overall Rating
C · 50.1 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
35.34
Team Governance
64.57
Market Ecosystem
57.06
Security & Compliance
54.25
Overall Score
50.1
Avantis has an overall rating Cf C (total 51.89), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main deduction points lie in the economic model (35.34 points) — mainly influenced by value capture (0 points) and token burn intensity (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Avantis has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of detailed information about recent technological upgrades.Weight 30%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Technical Implementation
66/100Consensus Mechanism?Relies on the mature Base/Ethereum PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has been running stably.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about recent technological upgrades.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Diversity?The underlying networks it depends on, Base/Ethereum clients, are highly diverse.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Tokenomics
38/100Deflationary Mechanism?The economic model does not explicitly include deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There is ongoing token unlocking, leading to an increase in circulating supply.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The proportion of staking or lock-up is moderate and has a certain impact on market circulation.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
64/100Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, supported by well-known VCs.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms exist, but the degree of decentralization is moderate.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Financial Transparency?Sources of funds and financing are open and transparent.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contract ownership carries centralized risk and is not managed by multi-signature.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Market Ecosystem
63/100Active Address?The number of on-chain active addresses performed well.Weight 30%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Currently, it is mainly deployed on a single chain, with limited ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi has a moderate total value locked and growth potential.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Security & Compliance
57/100Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The DeFi derivatives sector is facing a cautious stance from global regulators.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC has an unfriendly stance toward DeFi derivatives and unregistered securities.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
C Peer Comparison
Export CSV| AvantisC · 50.1 |  Layer3C · 53.24 |  Baby Shark UniverseC · 53.03 |  DevvEC · 52.85 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50.1 | 53.24 | 53.03 | 52.85 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 | 22.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 35.34 | 20.72 | 37.2 | 58.04 |
| Team Governance | 64.57 | 50.8 | 59.68 | 53.2 |
| Market Ecosystem | 57.06 | 96 | 62.92 | 66.86 |
| Security & Compliance | 54.25 | 62.36 | 60.42 | 52.51 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.