Audiera BEAT
Audiera leads in team governance and economic models, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D31.16 / 100
Sector Rank #348 · Global Rank #884
Overall Rating
D · 31.16 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
49.66
Team Governance
57.2
Market Ecosystem
36.28
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
31.16
Audiera has an overall rating Df D (total 31.58), ranking high in team governance, economic model, and market ecosystem across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating team conclusion: "Audiera has relative advantages in team governance, economic model, and market ecosystem, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Insufficient data, inferring from the model that the project has some development activity.Weight 35%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent upgrade delivery data is missing and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of pending delivery milestone data makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 20%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
History Extension Record?Historical deferral record data is lacking and cannot be evaluated.Weight 15%38 / 100 · 37.5 / 100
Technical Implementation
39/100Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature PoSA consensus mechanism, balancing performance and decentralization.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade details and quality assessment data.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?As an application layer project, client diversity is not suitable.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Tokenomics
51.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Inflation rate?There are regular large token unlocks, and inflationary pressure is significant.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The model shows low short-term selling pressure, suggesting a higher proportion of tokens locked.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
57.5/100Core Development Team?The core team is small, background information is limited, and development activity is insufficient.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Governance mechanisms?It has mature on-chain governance mechanisms and high community participation.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, with clear voting and fund usage for proposals.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Concentration of key people?High concentration of authority poses significant centralization risks.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
37.5/100Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on a single chain, with limited ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?Although it is not a typical DeFi, the project has a certain degree of liquidity within the BNB Chain ecosystem.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public developer activity data and low community activity.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There is a risk of permission leakage, and the security situation is worrying.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory compliance information and safety red line issues.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lacking a clear stance from the SEC, crypto assets are generally controversial.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency and the project has security red line issues.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| AudieraD · 31.16 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 31.16 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 49.66 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 57.2 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 36.28 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.