Bounce AUCTION
Bounce leads in team governance and market ecosystem, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D31.41 / 100
Sector Rank #395 · Global Rank #869
Overall Rating
D · 31.41 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
5.3
Team Governance
86.64
Market Ecosystem
58.85
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
31.41
Bounce has an overall rating Df D (total 31.41), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Bounce has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery, but current weaknesses are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
35.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public delivery data and sluggish development activity trends.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade information and sluggish development activity trends.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?There are a few public events, but a lack of clear pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?There is no historical record of delays, but no clear negative information.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Technical Implementation
73.25/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature Ethereum PoS mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a long operating time and has been market-validated.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of recent upgrade quality data, making it impossible to assess their impact.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As an Ethereum ecosystem project, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Tokenomics
9.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit deflationary mechanism has been found in the tokenomics model.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Inflation rate?The contract has additional issuance rights and carries potential inflation risks.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Staking or lock-up rates are extremely low, providing insufficient support for token demand.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a theoretical supply cap, but contracts can be issued additionally, so the reliability of the cap is low.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Team Governance
82.5/100Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and are backed by well-known VCs.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are sound, and community participation is high.Weight 25%88 / 100 · 88 / 100
Financial Transparency?High transparency in fund usage, and the community can monitor it.Weight 25%88 / 100 · 88 / 100
Concentration of key people?The concentration of critical permissions is moderately low and carries certain risks.Weight 20%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Market Ecosystem
51.55/100Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%86 / 100 · 86 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream blockchains, with extensive ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi's total locked amount is extremely low, weak in capturing ecosystem value.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Developer community?Developer communities are low in activity, and code contributions are inactive.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract has the authority to issue additional rights, posing a significant security risk.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Having additional issuance rights may lead regulators to identify them as securities, and the regulatory attitude is unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?Having rights to issue additional shares may lead the SEC to classify them as securities, but the SEC's attitude is unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?The contract has additional issuance rights, constituting a serious security vulnerability.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| BounceD · 31.41 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 31.41 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 5.3 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 86.64 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 58.85 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.