Arbitrum ARB
Arbitrum leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C-43.73 / 100
Sector Rank #118 · Global Rank #366
Overall Rating
C- · 43.73 / 100Roadmap Delivery
56.25
Technical Implementation
30.51
Tokenomics
54.38
Team Governance
69.4
Market Ecosystem
77.6
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
43.73
Arbitrum has an overall rating C-f C (total 43.01), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Arbitrum has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
57/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of near-term roadmap and on-time delivery data makes accurate assessment impossible.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project remains active, with clear upgrade proposals and development activities.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?The roadmap is clear, including important milestones such as decentralized sorting.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
History Extension Record?No clear record of significant delays was found in historical data.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
32/100Consensus Mechanism?Uses mature Optimistic Rollups, but L1 scores suggest areas for improvement.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has operated stably for nearly five years, accumulating rich experience.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Recent upgrades?Code updates are active, but quality scores show room for improvement.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?As an L2, it mainly relies on a single client, with limited diversity.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Tokenomics
51/100Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Inflation rate?The total supply is fixed, but a large number of tokens are continuously unlocked, creating inflationary pressures.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market circulation is large.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap to avoid unlimited issuance.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
68.5/100Core Development Team?The core team is highly experienced and backed by top VCs.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Governance mechanisms?It adopts a DAO governance model with a high degree of decentralization.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Financial Transparency?High transparency in fund management and proposal voting.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Concentration of key people?Permission concentration is moderately high, so potential risks should be monitored.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Market Ecosystem
76/100Active Address?High number of daily active addresses, with a solid ecosystem user base.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It owns multiple L2 chains, making the ecosystem highly scalable.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi has a high total value locked, demonstrating strong ecosystem appeal.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Developer community?The developer community is active, with high code contributions and star counts.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There is a risk of backdoor code and permission leakage, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, indicating significant compliance risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's compliance scores are extremely low, posing potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There are security red line issues, and the client faces high potential risks.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| ArbitrumC- · 43.73 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 43.73 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 56.25 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | 30.51 | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 54.38 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 69.4 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 77.6 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.