
Allo RWA
Allo, thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, remains a key focus on security and compliance, currently holding a solid D+ rating.
Sector Rank #280 · Global Rank #723
Overall Rating
D+ · 34.1 / 100Allo has an overall rating D+f D (total 34.1), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Allo has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery, but its current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
35/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of publicly available near-term roadmap milestone data.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends have been sluggish, with insufficient upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
62/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Chain's PoSA mechanism, it is highly efficient but moderately decentralized.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade details and quality assessment data.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As the BNB Chain ecosystem token, it relies on the diversity of mainchain clients.Weight 20%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Tokenomics
7.75/100Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear deflationary mechanism design, weak token value capture capability.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Tokens can be issued in increasing quantities, and the circulating supply is far below the total supply, posing significant inflationary pressure.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, the market circulation is large, and there is a lack of long-term holding incentives.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a theoretical supply limit, but tokens can be issued additionally, but the cap is weakly enforced.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Team Governance
76.25/100Core Development Team?Team members have strong backgrounds and have received investment support from several well-known VCs.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are relatively centralized, but funding and proposal transparency are relatively high.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Financial Transparency?Transparency in fund management and proposal voting is high, and the treasury is healthy.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated at a single address, posing a high risk of key persons.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Market Ecosystem
47.92/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is good, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%86 / 100 · 86.4 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Currently, it is mainly deployed on BNB Chain, with limited cross-chain ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not traditional DeFi and lacks direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Developer community?There is a lack of public developer activity data, and community activity is low.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
31/100Historical Major Failure?There are currently no publicly available major security failures, but there is a risk of additional permissions.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?RWA projects face strict regulation, with very low compliance scores and a cautious regulatory attitude.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Sec Attitude?As an RWA project, it faces strict SEC scrutiny and carries the risk of being classified as a security.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of publicly available client bug reports and data on fix frequency.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
D+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV AlloD+ · 34.1 | wojakD+ · 39.93 | Polyhedra NetworkD+ · 39.91 | yesnoerrorD+ · 39.9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 34.1 | 39.93 | 39.91 | 39.9 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 15.78 | 23.58 | 41.25 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 87.43 | 30 | 75.16 | 34.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 60.92 | 70 | 70.72 | 71.33 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 50.54 | 0 | 58.05 |



Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.