Adam Back Rejects Bitcoin Spam Claims, Warns BIP-110 Soft Fork Risks Network Split

Blockstream CEO Adam Back disputes BIP-110 spam arguments, citing mathematical censorship impossibility and warning that non-consensus soft forks may trigger a Bitcoin network split similar to BSV.

Woofun AI reports that Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, criticized proponents of BIP-110 on X, rejecting the assertion that "Bitcoin supports spam" and noting that all ecosystem participants oppose such data. He argued that absolute censorship is mathematically impossible within the Bitcoin protocol and highlighted technical flaws in the proposal that prevent it from gaining consensus. Back warned that enforcing rule changes via a user-initiated soft fork without miner support could lead to a network split comparable to the emergence of Bitcoin SV (BSV).